Bridge Four - Roll Call

Bridge Four needs to get some new members, but to that end, we need to make sure our current members are on their game.

All Bridge Four members need to leave a comment with their in-game name on this post so I know that you're active. Anyone that doesn't post will be kicked.

War rankings will be coming at some point, but for right now I don't have time to decipher the headache that is chinese/korean characters to determine who attacked what rank in war.

We have a good clan, with good members. I want to make sure it stays that way.

Thanks.

Bridge Six - New Recruits

Welcome.

Please leave a comment here to show your ability to communicate properly. Be sure your username is in your comment so I know who you are in-game.

All new members should absolutely read the Clan Rules page, link located on the left pane.

Make sure your base is set up as a good design, go to clashofclansbuilder.com to find high rated bases for your town hall level.

Please ask if you any questions. Once again, anyone that does not leave a comment on this post will be kicked.

Thanks,
Gilgamesh

B6 - Rankings VERSUS Bynzantium

Clan War Attack Ratings

Rank		Player	War Rating	New Stars	Power
1		fallendino	10.00	6	10.00
2		kalten	8.33	4	7.50
3		jaymel	5.33	5	6.83
4		arunava	6.67	4	6.67
5		trefallin	5.83	4	6.25
6		amer	3.33	5	5.83
7		tycks	6.67	3	5.83
8		peter	1.67	6	5.83
9		six	2.33	5	5.33
10		jibu	5.00	3	5.00

Bridge Six - Roll Call

We need more prospects for Bridge Four. To that end, I'm calling on all Bridge Six members to comment on this post, so I know who is and who isn't paying attention.

We need to see a lot more improvement in our attacks, and it just isn't happening. Clearly this is coming from the ones that do the absolute minimum to get by. 

If you're a member of Bridge Six, leave a comment on this post with your in-game account's name. That way I know who is who. Any members that fail to leave a comment over the next, we'll say 40 hours, will be kicked from the clan.

Thanks guys.

Clan War Attacking Ratings - Formula Change

Hello everyone.

I'm now lowering scores for loot attacks and highlighting those that used both attacks for loot in the rankings. If the loot attack's rating is lower than the other attack, the other attack will be used in its place, but cut down by three quarters. This is so members that didn't use loot attacks will be ranked higher than those that did.

I'm sure all of you have noticed the green highlighting for first place, and the red highlighting for our bottom-ranked members. Members who use both attacks as loot will be highlighted purple.

This will serve to show a pattern of sorts for those that may use their attacks for loot when the wars get serious. This was obviously not one of those wars, and the high number of purple is acceptable in this case.

While I'm still honing the formula, it will most likely not change much more into the process of me actually writing a program to do all this junk for me. In the mean time, I'm just doing it manually in a spreadsheet. The final revision to the formula will be to take into consideration who was attacked when there is nobody else within range that can be starred; I could only make this work in code, so it's not going to be done until I get around to writing the program.

I hope everyone is well, please ask if you have any questions.

Thanks.

B4 - Rankings VERSUS SpecOps

Clan War Attack Ratings

Rank		Player	War Rating	New Stars	Power
1		reaper	12.00	6	11.00
2		roy	12.00	5	10.17
3		morgrym	10.00	6	10.00
3		hecken	10.00	6	10.00
5		b4	12.00	4	9.33
6		smoke	9.33	5	8.83
7		ironmorty	10.00	4	8.33
8		chris	8.33	5	8.33
9		bestie	8.00	5	8.17
9		warrior	8.00	5	8.17

B4 - Rankings VERSUS Asian Clan 9

Clan War Attack Ratings

Rank		Player	War Rating	New Stars	Power
1		smoke	11.00	6	10.50
2		ironmorty	10.00	6	10.00
3		reaper	12.00	4	9.33
4		ashish	10.00	5	9.17
5		that guy	12.00	3	8.50
6		warrior	8.67	5	8.50
7		morgrym	8.33	5	8.33
8		ceazar	8.00	5	8.17
9		hjj	10.00	3	7.50
10		darren	8.33	4	7.50